Natalie and I were not hitting it off. In fact, I had become convinced she was trying to kill me.
I’m a non-confrontational person, and I don’t like it when someone’s not my friend. But in this case, our rocky relationship was especially alarming: Natalie was an 1200-pound quarter horse, and I was on her back. Precariously, I might add.
As we trotted up a steep mountain slope, another horse and rider pulled alongside us. Natalie’s ears flattened and her back leg shot out, blasting the other horse with a nasty kick. She quickly lunged to bite. The other rider pulled away but Natalie continued to spin in rage.
She settled, and as we again began picking our way up the slope, I could again take in what rancher Glenn Elzinga was trying to accomplish here on this rugged Central Idaho range. He shared this country with wolves, imperiled species like bull trout and sage grouse and sensitive habitats.
Glenn had long believed that cattle ranching could have a more positive impact on the land and wildlife around us. And to do this, he’s now incorporating ancient herding techniques, practicing what he calls “one of humanity’s oldest professions.”
But that doesn’t mean it’s easy. Up ahead of me and Natalie, Glenn’s voice boomed across the mountain. “We are dealing with rugged terrain and a lot of variables here,” he said. “You are working with horses and cattle and wolves and all these other creatures, and they often have their own agendas.”
He looked at me. “You can see how that could be difficult, out here in country like this.”
I looked down at Natalie, the one animal whose agenda I had to deal with at the moment. Yeah, I could see the challenge here. Could I ever.
Making a Home on the Range
I first met Glenn Elzinga at a Boise farmers market in the early 2000s. Tall, dressed in denim, with a bushy mustache, he stood out in the crowd. In addition to selling excellent grass-fed beef raised on his Alderspring Ranch, he was a natural storyteller and had a keen wit. I liked to stop by his booth and hear his ideas on ranching.
A few years later, he worked with The Nature Conservancy to purchase a ranch in Central Idaho’s Pahsimeroi Valley. I was director of communications for the Conservancy in Idaho at the time, so I learned more of his story. Glenn and his wife Caryl both had careers in natural resources but wanted to spend more time with their seven daughters. They had a vision for ranching, serving as good stewards of the land while also producing high-quality beef.
For years, they rented pastures but that didn’t allow them the control they wanted. The ranch they purchased, like many in the Intermountain West, included public grazing allotments. They were entitled to graze their animals on a defined area of public lands. Ranchers typically turn their cattle loose on these lands in the early summer, and then rounded them up in the fall.
Glenn believed that by producing organic, grass-fed beef, he could ranch sustainably and produce a better product. His Alderspring Ranch beef began earning acclaim from top chefs and winning taste tests. When food journalist Mark Schatzker searched for the perfect cut of beef – documented in his book Steak – his quest ended at Alderspring Ranch.
But that wasn’t enough for Glenn. Always curious, he wanted to find better ways to ranch on public lands.
I had written a lot about the Elzingas during my time with the Conservancy’s Idaho Chapter, but I hadn’t seen them for several years. When Glenn invited me to take a horseback tour of his public lands allotment and discuss a new technique he was employing, I was intrigued. The trip sounded even better when I learned that two of my favorite Nature Conservancy colleagues, Dayna Gross and Mark Davidson, would be joining.
“It will be an adventure,” Dayna promised.
She did not lie.
A Long Day Ahead
I started to have my misgivings early the morning of the tour. We would be joined by state and federal land management staff, who were also interested in Glenn’s grazing techniques. As they spilled out of their trucks, I noted they all donned well-worn chaps. They hoisted saddles and reins with the easy calm of experienced riders.
I tried to calm my growing sense of unease, but the increasing rain and wind weren’t helping.
Glenn led me to Natalie. “She’s really calmed down in the past few weeks,” he said. “She’ll be fine.”
There were 17 horses and riders on the trail, and soon we headed up the mountain. We quickly fell into line along a well-worn trail, but a half hour later veered off, heading down a steep slope criss-crossed with fallen timber. Natalie began shaking her head. “Watch out for sharp branches,” Glenn called out. “It really freaks the horses out. And you don’t want a blow up in this stuff.”
I definitely did not. I rode on, my anxiety blossoming into full-blown panic. And then we emerged into an open meadow. I breathed. I could do this.
Glenn’s daughter Melanie rode up alongside him. “Where to next, Dad?” she asked.
He pointed to a peak in the distance. My eyes tracked all that was between us and the destination: more steep slopes, more fallen timber, much of it far more gnarly than what we had just traversed.
I looked over at Dayna, desperately seeking an encouraging word.
“It’s going to be a long day,” she said.
More true words from my friend.
When the Big Dogs Come Calling
Glenn’s no stranger to long days, and his involve much bigger challenges than an unruly horse. It was one of those challenges that led him to adopt the new ranching practice.
As he bought groceries at the local store, a neighboring rancher approached him. “Your cattle are headed right towards a den of big dogs,” he said.
“Big dogs” is the local term for wolves. Glenn had already lost $20,000 worth of cattle to wolves, so the rancher’s pronouncement alarmed him. He checked with the local Idaho Department of Fish and Game office. The rancher was right: there was a radio-collared pack of wolves, and in a few days they would be meeting his cows. These meetings never end well.
“You’re within your right to have those wolves killed,” the agency staff person said.
And Glenn knew that was true: wolves were routinely killed for livestock conflicts. “I actually like wolves as an animal,” he said. “Wolves are here. They’re not going away. I thought there had to be a way to deal with this without confrontation.”
He moved his cattle off the public range and back to his private ranch, far from the predators. That was a short-term fix. “We were scratching our heads, trying to find a way that was proactive rather than reactive,” he said.
Months later, he was Christmas caroling at the home of an elderly rancher who collected Western memorabilia and art. Glenn looked at the wall and his eye caught a Charles M. Russell painting.
“There were cowboys on the range with a thousand head of cattle behind them,” he said. “This was in the days before barbed wire. These guys lived with their cattle. There were rustlers and grizzlies and wolves. They needed to protect the cattle and move them to the best grass they could find.”
Glenn couldn’t get that image out of his mind. They protected the cattle by staying with them.
“Why couldn’t we do the same thing?” he thought. “We could stay with the cattle and move them where we want to go. We could add in ecological objectives so that we could keep cattle out of sensitive habitat, and graze on the best quality grass.”
Herding this way is one of humanity’s oldest professions, and is still practiced by herding cultures from the Masai in East Africa to Mongolian herders on the Asian steppe.
But for a century or more in the American West, ranchers have turned their cattle loose on public lands allotments. “The cattle go downhill to water, and stay in the riparian areas,” he says. “The ranching becomes reactive. The goal is to keep them out of areas. Keep them out of sage grouse habitat, keep them out of creeks. You herd them out, and they would move back down at night.”
With 70 square miles to patrol, including 50 miles of creeks, finding all the cattle proved an impossible task.
Glenn’s plan was to herd the cattle where he wanted them to go, what he calls in-herding. They could plan the herding around ecological objectives. His allotments are home to sensitive species like sage grouse, bull trout, chinook salmon and steelhead. Aspen groves and streams have been hammered by generations of grazing.
“It’s really such a simple idea,” he said. “We’re going to be with the cows and direct them where to go rather than just let them loose and let them go where they want.”
It is simple, but he had to figure in the complexities of cattle, horses, wolves, endangered species and terrain. And people.
“Really, you have all these factors out here and the toughest of all to manage is people,” he said. “You need someone who has strong horsemanship and can move cattle. But they also have to buy into the ecological goals. That’s the hardest to find.”
An ecologically minded herder has to know vegetation and weeds. They have to know how wolves behave. They have to know what a healthy aspen grove looks like.
“The team dynamic is so important,” he says. “If someone on the team hasn’t embraced all aspects of herding, it affects that dynamic. Things start blowing up. Out here, you really do not want things to blow up.”
Into the Woods
A friend of mine on another backcountry horse trip once advised me that the best thing to do is “trust your horse.” After a half day in the saddle, I didn’t trust Natalie. And we had just entered the gnarliest slope of the trip, filled with fallen trees, boulders, impenetrable brush and marshy creek bottoms.
Through the thick cover, I couldn’t see most of the horses. The participants called back and forth to each other, directing us to the best routes. I could hear anxiety even among the experienced riders.
“Glenn,” one of them called out. “If this is where you take your friends, where do you take your enemies?”
Natalie picked her way down the slope towards a creek bed below. “When she gets to the creek, she’s going to jump,” Glenn’s daughter Melanie warned.
I hopped off. I did not want to be on a jumping Natalie, especially in this forest filled with objects that could impale me.
“Of course, with you on the ground, she’s now going to jump on top of you,” Melanie followed.
Faced with Sophie’s choice, I chose option C: Part ways with Natalie. I let go the reins and Natalie promptly bolted, disappearing from sight. I accepted the long, cold, wet, lonely hike out of the wilderness with joy. At least I would not be atop that mare.
I picked my way through the brush and emerged onto another mountain slope. I began climbing up to the top. Suddenly Glenn appeared on the horizon.
“Matt, don’t worry, we caught Natalie and she’s up here waiting for you,” he called.
I gave a half-hearted wave. “I was afraid you were going to say that.”
The Smartest Animals on the Range
The Elzingas have now completed their second season of in-herding. They practice what Glenn calls “meal planning” – developing a plan that keeps moving cattle towards the best rangeland.
“We aren’t pushing cattle with whips,” he said. “We want to have the cattle want to go where we need them to go.”
Even in this short time, Glenn sees the results, which is why he arranged this tour (although admittedly I have missed many of the highlights).
“Cattle were using the riparian areas extensively,” he said. “Now they are completely unused, unless there is an ecological reason for cattle to be there. I show pictures of riparian sites before and after in-herding, and people in the audience question whether it’s really the same place.”
And wolves? The big predators were, after all, what started this project. “We have no problems with wolves,” he said. “We have heard howling, but we have not lost an animal.”
“The biggest deterrent to wolves is human presence,” he continued. “Wolves are the smartest animals on the range, by far. We keep the cattle with us every night in small, temporary, hot-wire enclosures so they don’t wander off. And we’re with them. Wolves don’t want to be around us.”
Glenn continues to refine his techniques, reading, observing, talking to professionals from a variety of backgrounds. “I have always wanted to fuse ranching and science,” he said. “There’s a lot of science we can integrate into our management. We want to proactively wield tools that enhance ecological conditions.”
Just Another Day in Central Idaho
Back on Natalie’s back, I resolved to be more assertive with my horse. This resolve lasts at least five minutes, when she lunged and viciously bit a nearby horse. Then charged.
I felt like a meek substitute teacher trying to play nice with a bully. You know how this ends: the bully torments not only the teacher, but all the classmates. The other horses on this field trip now suffered Natalie’s wrath.
I tried to warn other riders away but Natalie began seeking out opportunities for viciousness. She lunged across a mountain meadow, and reared up to strike. Then she charged again. Glenn rode up to me. “I think it’s time,” he said. “To trade horses.”
And so I found myself on Glenn’s horse Ginger. My colleague Mark Davidson would later tell me a story of Ginger rolling down a mountain slope with Glenn on her back; I appreciated his restraint in waiting a few days to share this anecdote.
I found Ginger perfectly reasonable, but as I turned to share my relief with Dayna, I noticed she was missing. Looking ahead, I saw her horse barreling down the mountain full speed. “We have a runner!” someone cried.
It did not look like this would end well, but Glenn stopped the horse, and soon we were back on a well-worn trail, and then back to the starting point. I was sopping wet, sore and giddy. Adventure over.
And as Dayna and I drove down the rutted road, it hit me: For Glenn, it was just another day on the range. Managing naughty horses. Managing cattle that want nothing more than to wallow in a creek filled with imperiled bull trout. Accounting for rain and lightning and snow. Watching out for wolves that want to eat cattle. Managing cowboys, some of whom may think this idea is flat-out crazy. Identifying weeds and predator sign and weather patterns. Knowing what wetlands and aspens and sage grouse habitat and upland meadows look like when they’re healthy.
Getting up and doing it all over again.
Working in conservation, I hear a lot of talk about how to scale up our efforts, how to leverage projects, how to influence land management across millions of acres or even the globe. But at some point, all that planning has to hit the ground.
And when it does, it’s work. It’s this. Here is one ranch, one grazing allotment, and it is hard, hard work with no shortage of complexity.
But it’s also where conservation gets real: where you can look out and see food being produced without tearing up the land. See a land where we can have cattle and wolves, sage grouse and flowing streams.
I was glad ranchers like the Elzingas were up to the task, shaping a new way of public lands ranching. And even gladder to be off Natalie’s back.
What a Beautiful and inspirational story. It makes me feel good all over. Well, my butt is pretty sore after the days of riding.
My maternal grandfather and several uncles were west Texas cattle and bison ranchers. The bison were strictly for conservation purposes. Although, occasionally, one would escape and find the highway and an unwary motorist or Greyhound bus.
If I was 18, rather than 72 and somewhat disabled, I would follow the fire I feel from this article and continue the tradition with the consciousness of the Elzingas.
This is a very good article. It gives a very clear idea of how much work, knowledge, and effort it can take to establish and maintain real conservation. I commend the Elzinga’s for their dedication and hard work to preserve some of our nature while using old traditions to create superior food as well.
What a great story, one that sheds a whole new light on Ranching.
Hey Matt,
What a great adventure – so well told. I can so picture you and Dayna and Mark out there, and congratulations on surviving Natalie’s mischief!
Clearly the Elzingas are breaking old/new ground for allotment grazing, and they deserve a round of applause.
For those who object to cattle and grazing in general, I encourage you to think for a moment about what happens to all that land if it goes unused in our current reality. Greater pressure to open up public lands for development could lead to scattered houses, ranchettes, fences, etc. with far greater impact on sage grouse, elk, pronghorn, wolves, native grasses and trees than well-managed grazing practices will ever have. The May National Geographic is on point for the Greater Yellowstone Ecoregion.
The more SCIENCE applied to traditional agriculture, the better the health of our land, water and air. We still have a very long way to go, but pioneers like Glenn and his family can light the way. That is why The Nature Conservancy plays such a key role in balancing the needs of all the earth’s species – including the humans who need to grow and eat food.
I really enjoyed this article. Is there a program to help other ranchers to become more environmentally sound? Solutions seem possible. We just have to get the word out!
This gives me hope, but I wonder how it could work to integrate cattle with buffalo who already have the instinctive knowledge of how to live on open grasslands because they MIGRATE across these lands. Could cattle move with buffalo or would they interbreed? Would it take a specific sort of cow to do this? Would people be able to monitor them without interference, and keep the herds small enough to safeguard other plant and animal species? And not abuse water sources. Are my questions stupid?
The “problem” with integrating buffalo with cattle would likely be the current attitude around the buffalo herd at Yellowstone. The livestock producers & government are of the opinion that buffalo will infect cattle with brucellosis (has never happened YET) so they continue the hazing & slaughtering of this ever smaller herd of buffalo. Sad, really.
Did enjoy this article – sure a whole different outlook upon wolves by a rancher & the “in-herding” they do sounds like a much more nature oriented example of the use of allotments than “take the cows up there & turn them loose”!
Have enjoyed many of Matt Millers articles!!
Mr. Wuerthner has some good points in his comments. He is correct in several things. However, Glenn deserves praise as he is trying to preserve some of the lands and wildlife. It is a start. It certainly is better than free cattle every where. As I said, I am not entirely for cattle on public lands, but again this is a start. I think the only way to greatly reduce the destruction of public lands by cattle is to prevent them access to the land. Another way would be for beef consumption around the world to be reduced GREATLY; would require less land, less cattle, less methane, and less environment loss. However, that does not seem to be something going to happen any time soon.
This is an amazing and encouraging story that makes me think there is hope for the future. Thank you, Nature Conservancy
what an adventure! So glad some one like Glenn is ranching in a good way. Range beef is definitely better beef for consumption. No antibiotics! I don’t really approve of cattle on public lands, but if everyone ranched this way, maybe I would change my mind. Range beef is a win, win for so many reasons. Yes, there are some drawbacks, but no solution can encompass all problems. My hat is off to any rancher willing to put out the effort to have range beef and to do it responsibly toward wildlife, and the environment, especially on free public lands. Your article was inspiring, educational, interesting, and written with humor. Yes, horses are not always the quiet, docile animals so many think. They have personalities of their own, as do all animals.(two legged included).
Great story – hope the idea catches on.
I’ve lived on remote ranches in New Mexico and Texas as a kid where the cattle just roamed where ever they wanted until round-up time. I’m very impressed and appreciate your enlightened scientific approach to an environmentally responsible and interactive way of ranching with Nature!!!
Thank you,
Richard Schoonover
I WAS RAISED IN IDAHO BETWEEN MELBA AND MURPHY WITH THE SNAKE RIVER IN MY BACKYARD, AND MUSTANGS ROAMING FREE. WE LIVED ON THE LAND.NO POWER, NO INDOOR PLUMBING. WE HAD THE MEANS TO MAKE OUR OWN POWER, BUT CHOSE NOT TO. SUNSETS FOUND US ON THE FRONT PORCH WATCHING THE SUN GO DOWN. I LOVED LIVING THERE. I LOVED WATCHING THE COWBOYS. I LOVED THE NIGHT SOUNDS AS WELL AS THE DAY SOUNDS. I LOVED EXPLORING THE BRUSH WITH MY DOG DANNY AND LOVED THE CREATURES WE MADE FRIENDS WITH. THESE PEOPLE HAVE A HARD WAY OF LIFE, BUT IT’S WORTH IT. I WOULD GO BACK IN A HEARTBEAT IF I COULD.
Our species does know how to work–and to enjoy its challenges.
I hope Butch Slotter reads this story. Too bad he and his fellow ranchers don’t follow this scenario. Look at the money the taxpayers would save , not to mention the lives of many wolves.
It’s nice to see that someone is willing to adapt and live with wolves. They are not the enemy, people are.