Big Fish: Roadside Pike

University of Wisconsin researcher Dan Oele with a big northern pike from a small spawning stream.

University of Wisconsin researcher Dan Oele with a big northern pike from a small spawning stream.

by Matt Miller, senior science writer

Northern pike have always conjured images of wilderness: big, wild lakes, the scent of pine trees, a loon calling in the background.

Large, predatory fish, pike do indeed hunt lake shallows. They’re found in big places—from remote Alaskan and Canadian waters to the Great Lakes.

Come spring, they actually are on the move—traveling up rather small streams in order to spawn.

Researchers in Green Bay, Wisconsin have been tracking pike movements by conducting chemical analyses of pike otoliths, also known as ear stones. Otoliths have annual growth rings, like trees, and accumulate trace chemicals from the surrounding water column as they form.

Many streams have a specific—and unique—combination of chemicals, and this chemical profile shows up in the otolith when fish move from one chemically distinct water body to another.

As such, researchers can determine where pike spent different years of their lives – and if they return to the streams where they were born, or if they use different streams.

This knowledge, in turn, helps conservationists focus on restoring streams that will actually be used by pike.

When I headed out with researchers, I imagined we’d search for pike in wild, lonely places. Instead, we immediately drove to an area across from a small, rural housing development, cars whizzing by as we checked pike traps.

Where could the pike possibly be?

It turns out: In a roadside ditch.

These little ditches— the kinds designed to keep water off the road—have been used for a very long time by pike as spawning sites.

With hundreds of lakes, streams and wetlands within miles of Green Bay, it may seem odd to focus on ditches. But those little channels may be vital in restoring pike populations.

A Pike Expedition – Sort Of

The author's great-great grandfather with a trophy Wisconsin pike--that he probably speared in a roadside ditch.

The author’s great-great grandfather with a trophy Wisconsin pike–that he probably speared in a roadside ditch.

This is one of my favorite photos:  my great-great-grandfather John Ritchie stoically hoisting a 44-inch northern pike in one hand, a spear in the other.

To me, the photo always suggests a rugged outdoor life. I picture my him stalking pike on a remote North Woods lake, alone with his thoughts in a rugged frontier.

As I stand by a ditch near Green Bay, Wisconsin with the Conservancy’s Nicole Van Helden and the University of Wisconsin’s Dan Oele, they’re quick to puncture this romanticized view.

“Your relative almost certainly speared this pike out of a ditch,” says Oele. “It was a common practice for decades. People would line up along them and spear the pike, walleyes and suckers that swam past on their spawning runs. They’d fill their freezer with fish.  It’s highly doubtful he went to some remote wilderness to spear his pike.”

The little roadside culvert we stand beside looks wide enough to hold a pike, but only barely. A fish that can reach nearly four feet in length needs big water, or so it would seem. That’s the case most of the year, when pike swim through the shallows of Green Bay, devouring any smaller fish they encounter.

Come spring, pike surge up streams flowing into the bay. They quit feeding, and focus on reaching spawning sites.

Historically, streams in this region always followed meandering paths interspersed with wetlands. Pike routinely navigated shallow waters, as long as they were connected to each other.

Roads, farms and towns necessitated ditches throughout much of Wisconsin. But the pike — used to negotiating small waters—simply swam wherever it could, including channels.

“Pike adapted to ditches, because in many ways they are similar to the kinds of channels that used to be in coastal marshes,” says Van Helden, the Conservancy’s director of conservation for Green Bay.

Keeping Pike in the Ditch

Unfortunately, not all ditches are created equal. In some, road culverts are raised inches above the ditch, cutting the pike off from spawning waters. In others, narrow tunnels increase the velocity, blasting the pike away from its final destination.

The Conservancy and partners are currently surveying more nearly 1200 road-stream crossings to see if they could be improved for fish passage.  They are calculating stream velocity during the pike migration, and recording culverts that have waterfalls – which effectively stop pike. It’s part of a larger effort to identify the best places to improve passage for a variety of migrating fish species across the Great Lakes.

I’m currently looking into one of the roadside tunnels. It’s a typical roadside pipe running under a bridge. But it is elevated just enough so that it foils any pike that tried to swim up it.

“If you just moved this culvert down a few inches, it wouldn’t be a problem,” says Van Helden.

The research focuses on barrier removals that offer the most opportunities for fish passage at the least cost. The partners are currently creating a map that shows where the biggest barriers are located.

“Roads and culverts do need to be replaced periodically,” says Van Helden. “When the highway department is looking to replace, we want them to know they can redesign culverts so they aren’t barriers. We want fish passage to be a priority.”

It turns out that fish-friendly culverts also reduce bank erosion and have a longer life — reducing costs for highway departments.

“The research on pike reveals what they need,” says Van Helden. “We’ve found that one way we can help pike is to make sure they reach their spawning grounds. In some areas, removing one ditch can open up miles of habitat.”

This is the second post in an ongoing series on Conservancy fisheries research and how that work intersects with some of the biggest, wildest fish in freshwater. 

Researchers set a pike trap near Green Bay, Wisconsin. Matt Miller/TNC

Researchers set a pike trap near Green Bay, Wisconsin. Matt Miller/TNC

Opinions expressed on Cool Green Science and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Nature Conservancy.

Posted In: Fish, Science

Matt Miller is a senior science writer for the Conservancy. He writes features and blogs about the conservation research being conducted by the Conservancy’s 550 scientists. Matt previously worked for nearly 11 years as director of communications for the Conservancy’s Idaho program. He has served on the national board of directors of the Outdoor Writers Association of America, and has published widely on conservation, nature and outdoor sports. He has held two Coda fellowships, assisting conservation programs in Colombia and Micronesia. An avid naturalist and outdoorsman, Matt has traveled the world in search of wildlife and stories.



Comments: Big Fish: Roadside Pike

 Make a comment




Comment

Salmon Cam Returns

We’re pleased to return Salmon Cam, a live view of spawning Chinook and coho salmon and steelhead trout.

What is Cool Green Science?

noun 1. Blog where Nature Conservancy scientists, science writers and external experts discuss and debate how conservation can meet the challenges of a 9 billion + planet.

2. Blog with astonishing photos, videos and dispatches of Nature Conservancy science in the field.

3. Home of Weird Nature, The Cooler, Quick Study, Traveling Naturalist and other amazing features.

Cool Green Science is managed by Matt Miller, the Conservancy's deputy director for science communications, and edited by Bob Lalasz, its director of science communications. Email us your feedback.

Innovative Science

Forest Dilemmas
Too many deer. Logging one tree to save another. Beavers versus old growth. Welcome to forest conservation in the 21st century.

Drones Aid Bird Conservation
How can California conservationists accurately count thousands of cranes? Enter a new tool in bird monitoring: the drone.

Creating a Climate-Smart Agriculture
Can farmers globally both adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate change? A new paper answers with a definitive yes. But it won't be easy.

Latest Tweets from @nature_brains

Categories