New Survey Methods Bring Greater Speed and New Issues

 Social surveys using tablet computers cost less than 40% of similar surveys using paper forms because interviews went faster and there were no additional time was spent on data entry. Photo credit: Jessica Musengezi/TNC

Social surveys using tablet computers cost less than 40% of similar surveys using paper forms because interviews went faster and there was no additional time was spent on data entry. Photo credit: © Jessica Musengezi/TNC

As conservationists strive to integrate nature conservation with human outcomes, face-to-face surveys help gather the information on people’s lives and choices that is essential for designing effective programs and assessing outcomes. The new generation of lightweight and rugged tablet computers — together with simple, user-friendly survey software — can speed data collection and reduce costs for such surveys, reports Craig Leisher, a senior social scientist for the Conservancy.

Researchers often need survey data to understand the human elements of conservation programs – such as whether biodiversity protection affects incomes or how flooding affects migration. In the past, they would design a survey, hire and train a team of people who could speak the local language, print surveys and send the team out with clipboards in hand.

Leisher’s study, published in the journal Social Sciences, compares three surveys that the Conservancy carried out with partner organizations in East Africa. Two used this paper-based approach and a third used iPad mini’s and QuickTapSurvey software.

More Expensive Technology. Less Labor.

The cost of the six iPad minis they used was more than twice the cost of paper, pens and clipboards used in the paper-based surveys, but researchers quickly made up the difference in time. On average, interviewers got through 63% more interviews in a day when using tablets than when using paper.

The savings mounted further when they included the costs of data entry and checking — an often time-consuming and laborious process that happens once all those paper data sheets make it back to the office. The tablet survey incurred no additional costs for data entry and required little additional time to find and fix errors. Overall, Leisher concludes that the cost per interview when using tablets was only about 38% of the cost using paper forms.

This basic result was not a huge surprise; health researchers using tablets have achieved similar savings. But Leisher identifies a few issues in using the tablets that may affect the time savings or even the validity of results for surveys using tablets.

Unanticipated Issues

It took surveyors who were inexperienced with computers about five days to reach full efficiency at completing the interviews, so smaller surveys may not achieve the same cost savings. The tablets easily store a full day’s worth of interviews, but the safest practice is to upload data each evening. In situations where that is not possible, there will be greater risk of losing survey data if a tablet is lost or damaged.

In one unusual twist, some respondents sat next to interviewers, so they could see how the new technology worked. That meant that respondents read — rather than heard — the questions. That’s a methodological glitch to avoid in future surveys. When people hear the questions, they tend to choose the last answer given, but when they read them, they more often choose the first.

Leisher was not able to determine how often this happened and the effect is almost certainly less than 5%, in any case. But it’s a reminder to beware of unexpected issues with even the most promising new methods.

Posted In: Social Science

Marty joined the Nature Conservancy in January 2014 to write about TNC research and manage the Science Impact Project. She started her career in ecosystem ecology and climate impact research, but has focused on science communications since 1999. She’s now doing what she likes best – writing about cool science and helping scientists find and communicate what’s exciting about their work.



 Make a comment




Comment

Diverse Conservation

Call for Inclusive Conservation
Join Heather Tallis in a call to increase the diversity of voices and values in the conservation debate.

What is Cool Green Science?

noun 1. Blog where Nature Conservancy scientists, science writers and external experts discuss and debate how conservation can meet the challenges of a 9 billion + planet.

2. Blog with astonishing photos, videos and dispatches of Nature Conservancy science in the field.

3. Home of Weird Nature, The Cooler, Quick Study, Traveling Naturalist and other amazing features.

Cool Green Science is managed by Matt Miller, the Conservancy's deputy director for science communications, and edited by Bob Lalasz, its director of science communications. Email us your feedback.

Innovative Science

Infrared Sage Grouse Count
The challenge: find a chicken-sized bird in a million-acre expanse of rugged canyons & bad roads. Infrared video to the rescue.

Wildlife Videos In Infrared
Infrared enables us to see minor variations in temperature. See how this technology is revolutionizing conservation science.

Nature As Normal
TNC Lead Scientist Heather Tallis is researching how to make people see nature as critical to life through three lenses: education, water and poverty.

Latest Tweets from @nature_brains

Categories