Climate Change and Nutrition: It’s Not Just About Quantity

Increased carbon dioxide concentrations -- like those expected in the next 40-60 years--cause a nearly 10 percent decline in the zinc concentration of wheat, says a new study led by the Harvard School of Public Health. Photo credit: Yamanaka Tamaki/Flickr through a Creative Commons license.

Increased carbon dioxide concentrations — like those expected in the next 40-60 years — cause a nearly 10 percent decline in the zinc concentration of wheat, says a new study led by researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health. Photo credit: Yamanaka Tamaki/Flickr through a Creative Commons license.

Quick Study is just what it says — a rapid-fire look at a new conservation science study that might turn some heads.

The Study:

Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Samuel S. Myers, Antonella Zanobetti, Itai Kloog, Peter Huybers, Andrew D. B. Leakey, Arnold Bloom, Eli Carlisle, Lee H. Dietterich, Glenn Fitzgerald, Toshihiro Hasegawa, N. Michele Holbrook, Randall L. Nelson, Michael J. Ottman, Victor Raboy, Hidemitsu Sakai, Karla A. Sartor, Joel Schwartz, Saman Seneweera, Michael Tausz, Yasuhiro Usui, Nature, May 7, 2014, DOI: 10.1038/nature13179

The Big Question:

Discussions of climate change and food supply most often focus on questions of quantity. Will changes in rainfall and temperature interfere with the increased production that will be needed to support a growing population? A paper just published in the journal Nature grapples with a more insidious impact of increased carbon dioxide (CO2 ) concentration: how might it affect the quality of the global food supply?

The authors — a team of scientists from a dozen institutions, led by Samuel Myers, a research scientist at the Harvard School of Public Health — focused on concentrations of zinc, iron and protein in a variety of grains. “This study is the first to resolve the question of whether rising CO2 concentrations—which have been increasing steadily since the Industrial Revolution—threaten human nutrition,” said Myers, the study’s lead author.

Zinc and iron are a big deal because deficiencies in these nutrients reduce the immune system’s ability to defend against disease. World Health Organization (WHO) scientists already estimate that two billion people are not getting enough zinc and iron in their diets — shortening lives by 63 million life-years annually.

Study Nuts and Bolts:

Previous studies — mostly much smaller in size — have yielded mixed results on the question of whether carbon dioxide affects the nutritional value of plants.

The Nature study is the largest yet, drawing on the results of 143 comparisons from seven experimental sites in Japan, Australia and the United States. Researchers included only results from free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments, which are more reliable because they increase the CO2 levels for an entire system — as opposed to chamber experiments, which use potted plants in artificial conditions.

At all the sites, researchers compared the edible portions of identical cultivars under ambient (~380 ppm at the time most of the studies were performed) and experimentally-enriched CO2 conditions (546 to 586 ppm).

The Findings:

Differences were clearest and most dramatic in wheat, where the concentration of zinc declined by almost 10% and the concentration of iron and protein by about 5% under high CO2 conditions. Zinc and iron in rice, field peas and soy beans responded similarly, though less dramatically, with decreases between 3 and 8%.

The researchers saw no decrease in the protein content of peas and beans, which are legumes and can acquire extra nitrogen through their relationship with symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria.

Corn and sorghum showed no significant difference in nutrient content. That makes some sense because they are C4 plants, meaning they use a different method of photosynthesis than C3 plants such as wheat and rice. In C4 plants, CO2 is concentrated inside the plant before being taken up.

What It All Means:

In just the next 40-60 years, global average CO2 concentrations are predicted to reach 550 ppm – the level tested in this study. While a 5 or 10 percent loss of a few nutrients may not sound like much, it could have a large health impact, especially in places where the variety of foods is limited.

According to data from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 1.9 billion people live in countries where at least 70% of their zinc or iron comes from C3 plants. Reduction in the nutritional content of their food puts people at greater risk for diseases such as malaria, pneumonia and diarrheal diseases.

Different cultivars of the same crop did not always respond similarly — suggesting that it may be possible to partially counteract the effect by breeding for increased nutrient content (as is now done in golden rice for vitamin A). But plant breeding for specific traits often entails trade-offs in taste and yield; and improved seeds are often more expensive than traditional varieties. So there is no guarantee that farmers would adopt improved cultivars, even if they existed.

Many of the risks typically associated with climate change — such as drought, flooding, and species losses — are tied to predicted changes in temperature, moisture or ecosystem dynamics. Karla Sartor, who worked on the study before coming to the Conservancy to do grassland restoration, was struck by the direct line between increased CO2 and health effects.

“One of the things that I find powerful about this study” she said, “is that this is not modeled at all. We know that CO2 has increased and will continue to increase.”


Opinions expressed on Cool Green Science and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Nature Conservancy. 

Posted In: Quick Study

Marty joined the Nature Conservancy in January 2014 to write about TNC research and manage the Science Impact Project. She started her career in ecosystem ecology and climate impact research, but has focused on science communications since 1999. She’s now doing what she likes best – writing about cool science and helping scientists find and communicate what’s exciting about their work.



Comments: Climate Change and Nutrition: It’s Not Just About Quantity

  •  Comment from benguri

    Nature Conservancy editors are drinking kool-aid:

    “Previous studies — mostly much smaller in size — have yielded mixed results on the question of whether carbon dioxide affects the nutritional value of plants.”

    What a pile of coprolite. Just a quick google search and you will find larger studies that find declines in nutritional value of crops:
    http://is.gd/RyMbg1
    http://is.gd/AFm3dM

 Make a comment




Comment

Salmon Cam Returns

We’re pleased to return Salmon Cam, a live view of spawning Chinook and coho salmon and steelhead trout.

What is Cool Green Science?

noun 1. Blog where Nature Conservancy scientists, science writers and external experts discuss and debate how conservation can meet the challenges of a 9 billion + planet.

2. Blog with astonishing photos, videos and dispatches of Nature Conservancy science in the field.

3. Home of Weird Nature, The Cooler, Quick Study, Traveling Naturalist and other amazing features.

Cool Green Science is managed by Matt Miller, the Conservancy's deputy director for science communications, and edited by Bob Lalasz, its director of science communications. Email us your feedback.

Innovative Science

Forest Dilemmas
Too many deer. Logging one tree to save another. Beavers versus old growth. Welcome to forest conservation in the 21st century.

Drones Aid Bird Conservation
How can California conservationists accurately count thousands of cranes? Enter a new tool in bird monitoring: the drone.

Creating a Climate-Smart Agriculture
Can farmers globally both adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate change? A new paper answers with a definitive yes. But it won't be easy.

Latest Tweets from @nature_brains

Categories