Climate Change & Typhoon Haiyan: What’s the Connection, Science?

U.S. Marines help displaced Philippine nationals from the back of a KC-130J Super Hercules at Vilamor Air Base, Manila, Republic of the Philippines Nov. 11, 2013. Image credit: DVIDSHUB/Flickr through a Creative Commons license.

U.S. Marines help displaced Philippine nationals from the back of a KC-130J Super Hercules at Vilamor Air Base, Manila, Republic of the Philippines Nov. 11, 2013. Image credit: DVIDSHUB/Flickr through a Creative Commons license.

Bob Lalasz directs science communications for The Nature Conservancy.

The Philippines continues to stagger in the aftermath of Typhoon Haiyan, the most powerful tropical storm to make landfall in recorded history. Our thoughts are with the victims — and the question gripping environmentalists everywhere: How much was climate change to blame for the intensity of Haiyan or the devastation it caused? (Up to 10,000 deaths at latest count, with an economic toll that could hit US$14 billion, according to one report.)

Even George Clooney has weighed in on the question. Unfortunately, although he played an astronaut in “Gravity,” he’s not a scientist. What do real climate scientists (and the literature) say? The Cooler makes the rounds and finds a scatterplot of answers:


Bryan Walsh at TIME says that, while the “sheer power of Haiyan, as well as the still uncounted human devastation it has wrought, all but assures that the super typhoon will become a symbol of climate change for years to come,” it’s muddy at best whether we can definitively attribute any Haiyan’s strength to global warming. He quotes NASA climatologist Bill Patzert telling the Pasadena Star-News that “The fingerprint is very small, if at all. If the winds are 200 mph, global warming might have contributed 5 mph to that 200 mph.”

But the scientific uncertainty is beside the point, Walsh continues, because this storm represents the future.

“Models point to stronger, if not necessarily more frequent tropical cyclones as the globe continues to warm,” he writes, “though that signal may not become clear until later in the 21st century.” See, for instance, this July PNAS study by MIT climatologist Kerry Emanuel, which predicts that both “the frequency and intensity during the twenty-first century in all tropical ocean regions” will increase — particularly the western North Pacific, where Haiyan went on its deadly spree.


On the other hand, Quirin Schiermeier of Nature surveys the science and reports that, while the warmer sea surface temperatures climate change is causing potentially could intensify tropical storms, that effect could be blunted by a concomitant increase in shearing winds — which tend to knock down extreme storms. And while there’s some evidence that tropical storms have gotten more intense since 1980, Schiermeier notes, we only have quality data on this trend from the north Atlantic, not elsewhere.

Schiermeier also cites the Emanuel 2013 study, but warns that such predictions need to be inferred from modeling results, since the models themselves aren’t fine-scale enough to simulate “relatively small-scale atmospheric disturbances such as tropical storms.”


Meterologist Dan Satterfield, who blogs for the AGU Blogosphere family, calls claims that Haiyan was “a result of climate change….nothing short of ridiculous.”

Climate change, writes Satterfield, affects all weather, “but not any one event.” While global warming will mean an increasing number of more extreme weather events in the future, the future climate shift curve still includes less dramatic events as well — so “claiming a big snowstorm disproves climate change is just as silly as claiming a super typhoon is the result of one.”

Satterfield’s takeaway: We’re already seeing this shift in higher temperatures, but aggregate trends in storms will take more time to reveal themselves.


Following on Satterfield, the standard line from many climatologists about attributing individual weather events to climate change is that such science will take years (although we’re getting closer).

Wait a minute, Myles Allen of the University of Oxford tells Damian Carrington of the Guardian: Science could now determine just how much climate change influenced Haiyan…if we only dedicated sufficient resources to it. “If we used the same tools as are used now to make seasonal weather forecasts,” he tells Carrington, “there would be a straightforward answer.”

“We should know now how climate change is affecting us rather than how it will affect us in 100 years’ time,” Allen continues. “It is a common misconception that climate change affects everyone. It affects some people a lot and others not very much — but we don’t know who is who.”

But here’s what we do know, writes Carrington: Some scientists think climate change is making tropical storms bigger and badder by increasing the temperature gradient between sea level and the top of the storm — “as this gradient is the heat engine that drives the storm.” In addition, he quotes a Nature Geoscience paper from 2010 that predicted global warming will produce fewer but more severe tropical storms.


If you find the is-it-or-isn’t-it debate getting a little stale, Anne Lowrey of The New York Times Economix blog has a fresh take: a geographic and economic analysis of why the impacts of climate change will always hit the world’s poor the hardest — even in prosperous societies.

While rich countries might see “a disproportionate impact from global warming,” Lowrey writes, “poorer, lower-latitude regions are expected to face desertification and more-intense storms” — with sea-level rise some 15-20% higher in the tropics than the global average.

In addition, the poor face a double-whammy globally: They generally live in places more vulnerable to climate change’s effects (like flood zones), and the countries in which they live are generally poorer in the aggregate and thus have less resources and flexibility to adapt to a changing climate.

Correction (13 November 2013): The line about Kerry Emanuel’s study in item #1 should have read “which predicts that both ‘the frequency and intensity during the twenty-first century in all tropical ocean regions’ will increase.”

Opinions expressed on Cool Green Science and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Nature Conservancy. 

Posted In: The Cooler

Bob Lalasz is the director of science communications at The Nature Conservancy and the editor of the new Cool Green Science. A long-time editor and writer, he was previously the Conservancy's associate director of digital marketing. He now blogs here about the Conservancy's scientific research and on-the-ground work as well as larger conservation science and science communications issues.

Comments: Climate Change & Typhoon Haiyan: What’s the Connection, Science?

 Make a comment


Enjoy Osprey Cam Live!

The Ospreys Are Back!
Live views, 24/7, of an Alabama osprey nest. Record your observations and ask our ecologist about what you’re seeing.

What is Cool Green Science?

noun 1. Blog where Nature Conservancy scientists, science writers and external experts discuss and debate how conservation can meet the challenges of a 9 billion + planet.

2. Blog with astonishing photos, videos and dispatches of Nature Conservancy science in the field.

3. Home of Weird Nature, The Cooler, Quick Study, Traveling Naturalist and other amazing features.

Cool Green Science is edited by Matt Miller, the Conservancy's deputy director for science communications, and managed by Lisa Feldkamp, an American Council of Learned Societies fellow with the TNC science communications team. Email us your feedback.

Innovative Science

Call for Inclusive Conservation
Join Heather Tallis in a call to increase the diversity of voices and values in the conservation debate.

Infrared Sage Grouse Count
The challenge: find a chicken-sized bird in a million-acre expanse of rugged canyons & bad roads. Infrared video to the rescue.

Wildlife Videos In Infrared
Infrared enables us to see minor variations in temperature. See how this technology is revolutionizing conservation science.

Latest Tweets from @nature_brains