Nearsightedness and Nature-Deficit Disorder
Why are 80% of kids in Singapore nearsighted? Perhaps it’s a nature-deficit disorder.
Singapore has one of the highest rates of nearsightedness or myopia in the world, and parts of China and Taiwan are not far behind.
Most people assume it’s just genetics.
There’s certainly a lot of evidence suggesting a genetic link. In Australia, for example, if both parents have myopia, a child is eight times as likely to have it as well, and if both parents have severe myopia (at least -6 diopter), a child is 22 times as likely (Ip et al. 2007).
People of Chinese origins are particularly prone to myopia (Pan et al. 2012).
But here’s the Singapore twist. The city-state is a melting pot of Chinese, Indian and Malay ethnicities. Yet Singapore has a far higher myopia prevalence rate than India or Malaysia and a slightly higher rate than China.
Genetics almost certainly plays a role in myopia, but families generally share not only genes but also environments.
While our genetic DNA is written in “pen” and cannot be changed, some of our genes are written in “pencil” and can be rewritten by environmental factors.
Worldwide, there’s an urban-rural divide in myopia rates. In Nepal, for example, urban children age 15 have a 27% prevalence rate while it is less than 3% for rural children the same age (Pan et al. 2012).
So what’s different for many urban kids?
A comparative study of children ages six to seven with Chinese ancestry in Sydney and Singapore found kids in Sydney had a 3% prevalence of myopia while the same age group and ethnicity in Singapore had a 29% prevalence rate—almost ten times higher.
The study identified the most significant factor associated with the differences: time spent outdoors. The kids in Sydney spent 13.75 hours a week outdoors on average compared to just 3.05 hours for the Singapore kids (Rose et al. 2008).
The Sydney-Singapore study was one of more than a dozen studies that have zeroed in on the fact that outside sunlight helps prevent myopia.
A recent meta-analysis of myopia and outdoor time studies found that for every additional hour per week a kid spends outdoors, the chance of developing myopia drops by approximately 2% (Sherwin et al. 2012).
The single best way to protect a child’s vision is spend time outdoors in sunlight. Even if a kid is already nearsighted, increasing the time spent outdoors significantly reduced the progression of myopia.
No one is exactly sure how it works, but a recent Lancet article on myopia suggests that exposure to the sun’s rays stimulates production of the retinal transmitter dopamine, which in turn stops the eye from elongating and distorting the focus of light entering the eye (Morgan et al. 2012).
Thus, we can add myopia as another heath issue that’s linked to what Richard Louv called in his book Last Child in the Woods “nature-deficit disorder.”
Fortunately, the cure is just outside the front door.
Parental sanity may be the chief reason parents encourage kids to play outdoors, but now at least parents can feel virtuous that it will help their kid’s eyesight as well.
References
Ip, J. M., Huynh, S. C., Robaei, D., Rose, K. A., Morgan, I. G., Smith, W., & Mitchell, P. (2007). Ethnic differences in the impact of parental myopia: findings from a population-based study of 12-year-old Australian children. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 48(6), 2520-2528.
Morgan, I. G., Ohno-Matsui, K., & Saw, S. M. (2012). Myopia. The Lancet, 379(9827), 1739-1748.
Pan, C. W., Ramamurthy, D., & Saw, S. M. (2012). Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 32(1), 3-16.
Rose, K. A., Morgan, I. G., Smith, W., Burlutsky, G., Mitchell, P., & Saw, S. M. (2008). Myopia, lifestyle, and schooling in students of Chinese ethnicity in Singapore and Sydney. Archives of ophthalmology, 126(4), 527.
Sherwin, J. C., Reacher, M. H., Keogh, R. H., Khawaja, A. P., Mackey, D. A., & Foster, P. J. (2012). The Association between Time Spent Outdoors and Myopia in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology, 119(10):2141-51.
Image credit: Janee under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
Opinions expressed on Cool Green Science and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Nature Conservancy.
Make a comment
Authors
What is Cool Green Science?
Editors’ Choice
Follow Nature Conservancy Science on Tumblr
- RT @Jon_Hoekstra: My new blog -- Science Driven -- is up and running. Pls check it out and join in the conversations. http://t.co/gSZf26YEOP
- ‘Let’s Get Back to Ecology’: A New Interview with Peter Kareiva http://t.co/w2jgDx6e7P
- RT @biodv: Want to discuss the future of biodiversity? Read and comment on our interview with Peter Kareiva http://t.co/NoQXTIVbCl
Blogroll: Conservation and Science
- 10,000 Birds
- Bird Freak
- Blogfish
- Carl Zimmer's The Loom
- Climate Compass
- Collide-a-scape
- Conservation Biology Institute
- Conservation Bytes
- Conservation Magazine
- Deep Sea News
- Discover Magazine Blogs
- Dynamic Ecology
- Earth Lab
- Eat More Brook Trout
- Environmental Leader
- Gary Paul Nabhan
- God of Wednesday
- Grist
- High Country News
- I, Science
- Idaho Nature Notes
- Inside Science
- Knight Science Journalism Tracker
- Mongabay
- Mother Jones Blue Marble
- New Scientist
- New York Times Green
- Not Exactly Rocket Science
- NRDC Blogs
- Orion Blog
- Peter Gleick: Significant Figures
- Pew Environment Group
- Planet Change
- PLoS blog
- Prairie Ecologist
- Real Climate
- Science Blogs
- Science Daily
- Science Friday
- Science Jon
- Science Shots
- Scientific American Blogs
- Sea Monster
- Short Sharp Science
- Smithsonian Science & Nature
- Strange Behaviors
- Surprising Science
- Ted Williams Conservation Blog
- Tet Zoo
- The Blog Aquatic
- The Tiny Aviary
- TreeHugger
- Wired Science
- Yale Environment 360








