Robert McDonald is a vanguard scientist with The Nature Conservancy's Conservation Strategies Division. Robert works to evaluate the drivers, trends and conservation implications of emerging or understudied threats to biodiversity. Prior to joining the Conservancy, he was a Smith Conservation Biology Fellow at Harvard University, studying the impact global urban growth will have on biodiversity and conservation.Urbanization has domesticated the planet's nature -- so how do you do conservation in an world dominated by cities? The Conservancy's Rob McDonald has some thoughts. More
We're an urban species for the first time in history. How is our language about nature shifting as a result...and how are we going to talk to urbanites about conservation? More
More people live in cities than don't for the first time in human history -- and conservationists need to be prepared instead of complaining, says Rob McDonald. More
I work on the ecosystem services team at The Nature Conservancy, which strives to find ways to protect and strengthen the services that nature provides that are crucial to human well-being while also protecting biodiversity. But there are at least two definitions of “ecosystem service” floating around the conservation community. And within the tension between the [...] More
In a few weeks the world will turn its attention to Copenhagen, as diplomats gather to hash out an agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. For many environmentalists, including some of my colleagues here at The Nature Conservancy, it’s the culmination of decades of work and preparation. And yet while there’s a [...] More
As the “energy sprawl” idea has been discussed and debated in the media, I (one of the paper’s co-authors) have grown a thick skin against criticism. Perhaps the harshest piece of invective, however, still bothers me: the criticism by Matt Wasson in the Huffington Post. The factual criticisms Matt makes aren’t that troublesome to me, and [...] More
One of the difficulties writing for Cool Green Science is that our name necessarily constrains our subject matter. While we are all conservationists and hence prone to write on environmental topics most of the time, the occasional truly bizarre tangents into other issues that you’d get on a personal blog as the author meandered intellectually [...] More
Scientists want their research to inspire serious discussion of critical issues. So I’ve been encouraged by all the discussion in the press about the recent PLoS One paper I wrote with colleagues entitled “Energy Sprawl or Energy Efficiency: Climate Policy Impacts on Natural Habitat for the United States of America.” Still, it’s unsettling sometimes to see [...] More
During a dinner several months ago, the former U.S. ambassador C. Boyden Gray pointed a gaunt finger at me and said: “You environmentalists dislike ethanol, therefore you must want people to die.” While rhetorically grand, the accusation made little sense in the content of our dinner discussion about the potential land-use impacts of large-scale ethanol production. [...] More
The Amtrak train sits idle in the station, as the passengers alternately make cell phone calls from the platform or drink warm beer from their seats. There’s a gas leak ahead along the tracks in Baltimore, and the whole Northeast rail corridor is shut down. Coming on the heels of the June crash in the Washington [...] More
Robert Lalasz on Has ‘Climategate’ Affected Your Trust in Science?
James Richard Tyrer on Has ‘Climategate’ Affected Your Trust in Science?
Penina S. Finger on Has ‘Climategate’ Affected Your Trust in Science?
What Should We Call What Nature Provides Us?
(84)
Nature.org Wins Two Webby Awards: Needs Acceptance Speech
(76)
Open Thread: Which Eco-Issue Keeps You Up at Night?
(63)
Open Thread August: Why Don't Americans Get Climate Change?
(48)

