Funny how when the sun stops flaring, the earth cools. What have you done lately to reduce solar flares? Now that plan is worth bankrupting Developed countries to achieve.

C(fossil fuel) + O2(air) = CO2 + H2O + Heat (Hopefully you accept this equation)
You therefore must accept this chemical reaction occurring simultaneously:
CO2 + H2O + sunlight = C6-H12-O6(biomass) + O2. ( photoautotrophic growth)

Therefore, the only relevant question regarding AGW, is to ask which chemical reaction taking place is returning the greater volume of gas to the atmosphere. Is it combustion, respiration, decomposition (plus other inorganic redox reactions) which consumes oxygen and produces Carbon Dioxide, or photoautropic growth which consumes CO2 and produces Oxygen?

Air-breathing plants plus aquatic carbon-fixing phytoplankton produce about 150,000,000,000 tonnes of biomass every year. This is a huge mass but this includes everything that grows across the whole planet including the oceans. To complete this photoautropic activity, living matter has to sequester about 470 billion tons of CO2 annually from the atmosphere to produce this amount of biomass. Of this, about 10% of the CO2 (47 billion tonnes), is permanently lost to the atmosphere due to the creation of irreducible biomass and carboniferous deposition. Add to this the 4 billion tons of organic-based waste which is buried in landfill sites around the world, (representing approx 12 billion tons of CO2), gives a total loss to the atmosphere of 59 billion tons of CO2. Since the declared total amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere worldwide is 29 billion tons (US Energy Information Administration) leaves a 30 billion ton shortfall of CO2 in the atmosphere. Your AGW prognostications has to be wrong. Even at a very basic level, the imagined rise in CO2 for any industrialised country would be offset by the mere waste (80% carbon) that’s permanently captured when buried in landfill sites.

All of our work in southeast Alaska is guided by our comprehensive, state-of-the art scientific assessment of the region, completed in partnership with long-term Tongass expert Dr. John Schoen of Audubon Alaska, and reviewed by the country’s leading forest scientists. It is available for review at [http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/akcfm]. This assessment guides all of our efforts — from on-the-ground work to restore streams and forests for wild salmon and deer [http://www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/alaska/preserves/art27139.html] to our efforts to achieve lasting conservation for the most important rainforest watersheds, while also seeking to meet the diverse needs of rural communities who depend on working forests and fisheries for their livelihoods. You can learn more about these efforts, such as the Tongass Futures Roundtable [http://www.nature.org/initiatives/forests/features/art28065.html] at our website.

in the Peruvian Amazon the indigenous are stopping the rainforest being cut down and freezing oil exploration, yet greens in the rest of the world ignore them, even when the Peruvian government goes in and kills them (Bagua massacre occurred on world environment day)

I think you suggestions on climate change are largely lame, support the indigenous, the US government is working very hard to attack them and the forest via a ‘free trade agreement’ with Peru.

Find out about the indigenous and support them, they support you by actually doing something serious to stop climate change

‘todos y todos somos Awajun and Wampis’!