<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia: Land of the Unusual, or the Homogenized?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nature.org/2009/09/australia-michael-looker-mammal-extinction-introduced-species-camel-pig-cat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nature.org/2009/09/australia-michael-looker-mammal-extinction-introduced-species-camel-pig-cat/</link>
	<description>A blog on conservation, from migratory birds to coral reefs, from rainforests to climate change to personal green technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:29:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nature.org/2009/09/australia-michael-looker-mammal-extinction-introduced-species-camel-pig-cat/comment-page-1/#comment-11407</link>
		<dc:creator>brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nature.org/?p=6717#comment-11407</guid>
		<description>hmmm... now, i know this isn&#039;t strictly a matter of empiricism but, conventionally speaking - and in terms of sheer land area, and biological and geological distinctiveness - shouldn&#039;t australia be properly referred to as a continent rather than as an island?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm&#8230; now, i know this isn&#8217;t strictly a matter of empiricism but, conventionally speaking &#8211; and in terms of sheer land area, and biological and geological distinctiveness &#8211; shouldn&#8217;t australia be properly referred to as a continent rather than as an island?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

